H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Kamil Majchrzak vs Kei Nishikori H2H: 0-1
Kei Nishikori holds a 1–0 lead over Kamil Majchrzak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kei Nishikori leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kei Nishikori won the 2019 Australian Open first round 3-6 6-7(6) 6-0 6-2 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Poland
Age 30
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Japan
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kei Nishikori | 3-6 6-7(6) 6-0 6-2 3-0 (ret.) | Kamil Majchrzak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kamil Majchrzak | #66 | #45 | 1,032 | 1,822 | 46 | 55 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kei Nishikori | #464 | #4 | 6,385 | 2,245 | 424 | 226 | 65.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kamil Majchrzak | Kei Nishikori | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #286 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #418 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #25 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #19 | 1,971 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #17 | 1,940 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #5 | 2,211 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2021 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #117 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 51–17 | 75.0% | #8 | 2,131 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #5 | 2,151 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #22 | 2,067 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,105 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #62 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #13 | 2,001 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #66 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #41 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #47 | 1,945 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #352 | 1,938 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #106 | 1,863 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,809 | 0 | 12 |