H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Kamil Majchrzak vs Nick Kyrgios H2H: 0-1
Nick Kyrgios holds a 1–0 lead over Kamil Majchrzak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nick Kyrgios leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nick Kyrgios won the 2022 Tokyo fourth round 3-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Poland
Age 30
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 31
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2022* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Nick Kyrgios | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Kamil Majchrzak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kamil Majchrzak | #66 | #45 | 1,032 | 1,822 | 46 | 55 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,153 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kamil Majchrzak | Nick Kyrgios | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2021 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #117 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,951 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,096 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #62 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #66 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,896 | 0 | 7 |