H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Kamil Majchrzak vs Roberto Bautista Agut H2H: 0-1
Roberto Bautista Agut holds a 1–0 lead over Kamil Majchrzak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roberto Bautista Agut leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2022 Miami Masters second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Poland
Age 30
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2022* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-3 6-3 | Kamil Majchrzak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kamil Majchrzak | #66 | #45 | 1,032 | 1,822 | 46 | 55 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #180 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,106 | 411 | 294 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kamil Majchrzak | Roberto Bautista Agut | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #117 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #58 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #62 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #66 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,932 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,870 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #180 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 |