H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kamil Majchrzak vs Sam Querrey
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Kamil Majchrzak vs Sam Querrey.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Poland
Age 30
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
USA
Age 38
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kamil Majchrzak | #66 | #45 | 1,032 | 1,822 | 46 | 55 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sam Querrey | #529 | #11 | 2,595 | 2,037 | 372 | 315 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kamil Majchrzak | Sam Querrey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #130 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #63 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #25 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #18 | 1,872 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #93 | 1,816 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #22 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2021 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #117 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #46 | 1,877 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #62 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,943 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #66 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,822 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #44 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,817 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #108 | 1,702 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #329 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 |