H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Anders Jarryd H2H: 1-1
Karel Novacek and Anders Jarryd are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Karel Novacek won the 1993 Zaragoza semifinal 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 65
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1993* | Zaragoza | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Karel Novacek | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1993* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Anders Jarryd | 6-3 7-5 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Anders Jarryd | #1,316 | #5 | 957 | 2,059 | 371 | 251 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Anders Jarryd | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #58 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 1,982 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #19 | 1,883 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,957 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #32 | 1,820 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 1990 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #73 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 1993 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #67 | 1,624 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #124 | 1,643 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #410 | 1,528 | 0 | 8 |