H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 14:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Bernd Karbacher H2H: 0-1
Bernd Karbacher holds a 1–0 lead over Karel Novacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernd Karbacher leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bernd Karbacher won the 1992 Munich quarterfinal 7-5 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 1992* | Munich | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Bernd Karbacher | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Bernd Karbacher | #730 | #22 | 1,177 | 1,847 | 133 | 157 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Bernd Karbacher | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #39 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #57 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #217 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 1998 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #117 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #637 | 1,534 | 0 | 2 |