H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Karel Novacek vs Fernando Meligeni H2H: 0-1

Fernando Meligeni holds a 1–0 lead over Karel Novacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Meligeni leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 1994 Chile Open round of 16 4-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karel Novacek
CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Fernando Meligeni
BRA Age 55 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Meligeni #92 4-6 6-4 6-2 Karel Novacek #31 Match data Oct 28, 1994* R16 Chile Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karel Novacek #1,345 #8 1,754 1,997 287 231 55.4% 0 1 0 0 12 13
Fernando Meligeni #675 #25 1,316 1,888 189 201 48.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karel Novacek Fernando Meligeni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1984 6–6 50.0% #138 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1985 4–4 50.0% #159 1,558 0 0 1991 2–2 50.0% #206 1,514 0 0
21 1986 16–14 53.3% #33 1,693 0 1 1992 3–4 42.9% #169 1,497 0 0
22 1987 17–22 43.6% #76 1,643 0 1 1993 6–7 46.2% #99 1,554 0 0
23 1988 13–13 50.0% #127 1,637 0 1 1994 14–19 42.4% #91 1,599 0 0
24 1989 16–13 55.2% #74 1,685 0 2 1995 22–18 55.0% #64 1,697 0 1
25 1990 31–29 51.7% #34 1,706 0 3 1996 17–18 48.6% #94 1,679 0 2
26 1991 56–29 65.9% #8 1,844 0 7 1997 24–19 55.8% #67 1,714 0 2
27 1992 37–23 61.7% #23 1,822 0 10 1998 18–20 47.4% #57 1,654 0 3
28 1993 41–22 65.1% #17 1,761 0 12 1999 27–26 50.9% #29 1,685 0 3
29 1994 36–29 55.4% #28 1,790 0 13 2000 14–21 40.0% #100 1,622 0 3
30 1995 13–24 35.1% #121 1,597 0 13 2001 17–16 51.5% #71 1,709 0 3
31 1996 1–3 25.0% #409 1,581 0 13 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,651 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2003 6–8 42.9% #210 1,638 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karel Novacek Fernando Meligeni
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1986 8 5 13 61.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 1 6 7 14.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
23 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1989 — — — — 15 11 26 57.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 21 13 34 61.8% — — — — — — — —
25 1990 8 10 18 44.4% 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1996 4 7 11 36.4% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1991 9 5 14 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — — — — —
27 1992 2 5 7 28.6% 27 10 37 73.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1998 2 8 10 20.0% 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — — — — —
28 1993 10 2 12 83.3% 21 13 34 61.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1999 4 11 15 26.7% 23 14 37 62.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1994 11 8 19 57.9% 18 13 31 58.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2000 4 8 12 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 7 11 18 38.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2001 7 5 12 58.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 54 54 108 50.0% 182 113 295 61.7% 10 12 22 45.5% 41 52 93 44.1% — 38 71 109 34.9% 149 120 269 55.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 286/314 of Karel Novacek's and 325/390 of Fernando Meligeni's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Karel Novacek Fernando Meligeni
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 4/4 3.0 1.8 51.5% 77.4% 58.7% 53.6% 25.6% 68.0% 35.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 5/7 3.6 2.6 53.6% 62.4% 47.7% 36.8% 39.7% 55.4% 39.4%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 11/13 4.3 2.5 55.5% 71.4% 50.4% 56.5% 47.6% 61.6% 40.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 30/33 2.3 1.9 56.1% 67.4% 52.6% 47.6% 42.2% 61.1% 38.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 35/40 3.3 2.7 51.9% 69.7% 46.1% 54.3% 45.5% 58.4% 41.5%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 24/35 3.0 4.1 54.2% 67.5% 44.8% 54.5% 47.9% 57.1% 40.1%
26 1991 78/85 5.3 2.6 56.5% 73.8% 52.0% 60.4% 45.8% 64.6% 39.7% 1997 35/43 4.1 3.1 57.6% 69.6% 48.2% 51.8% 44.0% 60.4% 39.9%
27 1992 57/60 4.7 1.9 54.9% 72.2% 49.8% 62.9% 42.5% 62.1% 41.6% 1998 32/38 3.1 3.9 57.3% 69.6% 47.5% 59.7% 45.3% 60.0% 37.9%
28 1993 54/63 6.6 2.2 55.4% 75.3% 51.7% 58.5% 37.1% 64.6% 38.9% 1999 39/53 3.2 3.4 58.4% 69.0% 49.8% 52.4% 42.1% 61.0% 40.1%
29 1994 59/65 8.2 2.5 57.7% 74.0% 48.7% 61.7% 41.0% 63.3% 37.2% 2000 29/35 3.3 4.1 58.4% 66.9% 43.6% 54.8% 43.6% 57.1% 38.6%
30 1995 35/37 7.4 1.9 57.7% 71.3% 50.2% 60.4% 34.5% 62.4% 34.5% 2001 31/33 4.8 3.9 55.4% 68.4% 52.6% 54.3% 41.8% 61.3% 38.7%
31 1996 3/4 4.7 2.3 59.4% 74.5% 42.8% 68.1% 31.3% 62.7% 37.8% 2002 36/42 4.0 3.5 58.0% 69.4% 50.9% 60.1% 42.0% 61.3% 38.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 14/14 3.8 3.1 56.1% 67.3% 49.0% 63.2% 43.4% 59.5% 38.2%
Career — 286/518 6.3 2.3 56.4% 73.5% 50.5% 60.9% 41.0% 63.6% 38.8% — 325/390 3.5 3.3 56.3% 68.8% 48.8% 54.6% 43.5% 59.9% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karel Novacek Fernando Meligeni
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1984 1554 120.6 — — — — — +73 — 47.1% +0.03 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.9 +1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 1559 111.3 — — — — — +51 — 45.5% -0.14 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.91 1991 1515 104.5 +1.14 -1.78 1.110 50.9% +33 — — 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–0 — +0.13
21 1986 1693 138.0 — — — — -50 -14 — 50.6% -0.09 7–4 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 108.6 -0.16 1992 1498 104.3 -2.12 -0.09 0.882 47.7% +22 +56 — 41.2% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +1.18
22 1987 1644 137.9 — — — — -102 +98 — 46.7% +0.06 6–10 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 95.7 +1.36 1993 1555 121.4 -0.48 +0.93 1.046 50.8% — +70 — 50.0% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.5 +0.81
23 1988 1638 121.5 — — — — -155 +57 — 51.6% +0.30 2–4 (33%) 4–7 (36%) 94.5 +1.33 1994 1600 130.8 -0.28 -0.02 0.988 49.8% -139 +56 — 43.9% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 96.5 -0.77
24 1989 1686 137.1 — — — — — +65 — 56.0% +0.36 4–6 (40%) 5–4 (56%) 99.7 +0.04 1995 1698 139.6 -1.20 +1.92 0.999 49.9% -228 +58 — 52.0% +0.06 8–7 (53%) 7–7 (50%) 100.1 -0.61
25 1990 1706 145.2 — — — — -134 +115 -67 52.5% +0.39 10–11 (48%) 9–16 (36%) 97.5 -1.44 1996 1680 125.7 -2.61 +0.74 0.933 48.6% -210 +47 — 48.8% -0.22 8–6 (57%) 9–7 (56%) 104.3 -0.66
26 1991 1844 151.2 +3.93 +0.54 1.121 52.1% -150 +204 -155 60.5% +0.61 20–10 (67%) 20–15 (57%) 109.9 -0.67 1997 1715 130.0 +0.03 +0.82 1.007 50.2% -163 +33 — 53.7% +0.24 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) 106.7 +0.04
27 1992 1823 144.1 +1.07 +1.67 1.099 51.8% -121 +168 — 59.7% +0.68 10–8 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 96.2 +2.36 1998 1655 134.6 -1.38 -0.50 0.948 49.4% -132 +72 — 52.9% +0.21 3–6 (33%) 8–8 (50%) 97.0 -0.25
28 1993 1761 150.9 +3.30 +0.41 1.101 51.5% +58 +119 — 61.3% +0.58 13–9 (59%) 15–7 (68%) 104.9 +0.47 1999 1685 146.4 0.00 +2.19 1.027 50.7% -179 +154 — 54.5% +0.55 6–10 (38%) 6–10 (38%) 95.1 -1.85
29 1994 1790 137.5 +2.00 -1.28 1.013 50.0% -3 +61 -147 51.2% +0.10 17–8 (68%) 17–13 (57%) 103.5 -0.07 2000 1622 122.9 -3.48 +0.06 0.899 47.7% -120 +87 — 42.2% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 7–5 (58%) 103.6 +0.73
30 1995 1597 135.5 +0.95 -2.95 0.917 48.7% +86 +123 — 41.8% -0.54 5–10 (33%) 7–6 (54%) 91.9 -0.66 2001 1709 129.6 -0.09 +0.50 1.001 50.1% -108 +14 — 51.8% +0.11 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.2 -0.38
31 1996 1582 114.3 -0.91 +0.70 1.012 49.9% +98 — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.27 2002 1651 130.9 -0.02 +0.44 0.984 49.8% -47 +51 — 43.1% -0.47 6–5 (55%) 4–7 (36%) 98.4 +0.69
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1638 118.4 -1.54 +0.56 0.943 49.0% -34 +15 — 42.4% -0.49 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.3 -0.74
Career — 1997 147.3 +2.43 -0.06 1.064 51.1% -57 +111 -125 53.9% +0.29 100–84 (54%) 103–95 (52%) 101.9 +0.84 — 1889 137.9 -0.90 +0.70 0.979 49.7% -124 +66 — 49.3% -0.03 59–61 (49%) 58–65 (47%) 99.9 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.