H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Franco Davin H2H: 4-1
Karel Novacek holds a 4–1 lead over Franco Davin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Karel Novacek leads 4–1 on clay. Most recently, Karel Novacek won the 1992 Prague final 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1992* | Prague | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Karel Novacek | 6-1 6-1 | Franco Davin | Match data |
| Jul 27, 1991* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Karel Novacek | 7-6(3) 2-6 6-2 | Franco Davin | Match data |
| May 4, 1991* | Madrid | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Karel Novacek | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Franco Davin | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1989* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Franco Davin | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1987* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Karel Novacek | 6-0 4-6 6-2 | Franco Davin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Franco Davin | #960 | #30 | 774 | 1,852 | 153 | 152 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Franco Davin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #508 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #166 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #94 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #73 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #35 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #112 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #46 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #103 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #248 | 1,550 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |