H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Goran Ivanisevic H2H: 0-1
Goran Ivanisevic holds a 1–0 lead over Karel Novacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Goran Ivanisevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 1996 Dubai fourth round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 54
Left-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 1996* | Dubai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-3 7-5 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Goran Ivanisevic | #395 | #2 | 3,572 | 2,124 | 561 | 316 | 64.0% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Goran Ivanisevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #371 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #40 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,921 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 57–18 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,090 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 9 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 62–26 | 70.5% | #5 | 1,976 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 76–24 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,001 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #12 | 1,873 | 0 | 21 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,713 | 0 | 21 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #129 | 1,596 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 2001 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #12 | 1,814 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #243 | 1,698 | 1 | 22 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #657 | 1,646 | 1 | 22 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #266 | 1,632 | 1 | 22 |