H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Guy Forget H2H: 1-2
Guy Forget holds a 2–1 lead over Karel Novacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Guy Forget leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Karel Novacek won the 1995 Stuttgart Indoor third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1995* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Karel Novacek | 6-3 7-5 | Guy Forget | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1991 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Carpet | Guy Forget | 6-3 7-6(3) | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| May 9, 1990* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Guy Forget | 6-4 7-5 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Guy Forget | #1,367 | #4 | 2,392 | 2,038 | 356 | 279 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Guy Forget | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #94 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #61 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,978 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,861 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 1994 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 1995 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,690 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #1121 | 1,599 | 0 | 11 |