H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 0-2
Jakob Hlasek holds a 2–0 lead over Karel Novacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1993 Stuttgart Indoor third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 1993* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jakob Hlasek | 6-3 6-2 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| Nov 13, 1987* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jakob Hlasek | 7-6 6-4 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Jakob Hlasek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 |