H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Karol Kucera H2H: 2-0
Karel Novacek holds a 2–0 lead over Karol Kucera in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karel Novacek leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Karel Novacek won the 1995 Barcelona second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 1995* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Karel Novacek | 6-4 6-3 | Karol Kucera | Match data |
| Aug 13, 1992* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Karel Novacek | 6-1 7-6(6) | Karol Kucera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Karol Kucera | #1,540 | #6 | 2,732 | 1,994 | 259 | 230 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Karol Kucera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #352 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #63 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #8 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #17 | 1,851 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #73 | 1,764 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #101 | 1,721 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #83 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 2003 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,764 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 2004 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #91 | 1,674 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #310 | 1,669 | 0 | 6 |