H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Lionel Roux H2H: 2-0
Karel Novacek holds a 2–0 lead over Lionel Roux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karel Novacek leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karel Novacek won the 1995 Ostrava third round 3-6 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1995* | Ostrava | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Karel Novacek | 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Lionel Roux | Match data |
| Aug 26, 1994* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Karel Novacek | 7-6(7) 5-7 7-6(5) | Lionel Roux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Lionel Roux | #975 | #48 | 808 | 1,726 | 76 | 116 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Lionel Roux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #101 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #255 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #559 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |