H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Magnus Larsson H2H: 2-1
Karel Novacek holds a 2–1 lead over Magnus Larsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Karel Novacek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karel Novacek won the 1993 Schenectady fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1993* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Karel Novacek | 6-3 6-4 | Magnus Larsson | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1993* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Magnus Larsson | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| Apr 3, 1993* | Estoril | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Karel Novacek | 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(4) | Magnus Larsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Magnus Larsson | #1,422 | #10 | 2,222 | 2,040 | 293 | 217 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Magnus Larsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #56 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,802 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #39 | 1,820 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #19 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #46 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #25 | 1,891 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #95 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 2000 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #75 | 1,770 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,728 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #507 | 1,689 | 0 | 7 |