H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Marc Rosset H2H: 1-4
Marc Rosset holds a 4–1 lead over Karel Novacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Marc Rosset leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marc Rosset won the 1995 Gstaad third round 2-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1995* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marc Rosset | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| Apr 28, 1994* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marc Rosset | 6-4 6-4 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1992* | Moscow | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Marc Rosset | 6-4 6-2 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| Jul 12, 1990* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marc Rosset | 7-6 5-7 6-2 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| Apr 11, 1990* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Karel Novacek | 6-3 6-2 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Marc Rosset | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 |