H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 0-1
Nicolas Lapentti holds a 1–0 lead over Karel Novacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Lapentti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 1996 Bermuda third round 7-5 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1996* | Bermuda | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicolas Lapentti | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Nicolas Lapentti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |