H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Pat Cash H2H: 0-3
Pat Cash holds a 3–0 lead over Karel Novacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pat Cash leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pat Cash won the 1991 Brussels third round 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 1991* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pat Cash | 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| Jan 16, 1991* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Pat Cash | 6-2 6-4 6-1 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1986* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Pat Cash | 6-3 6-7 6-1 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Pat Cash | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 |