H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Patrik Kuhnen H2H: 1-2
Patrik Kuhnen holds a 2–1 lead over Karel Novacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Patrik Kuhnen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patrik Kuhnen won the 1995 Vienna third round 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 60
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 1995* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Patrik Kuhnen | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| Feb 17, 1994* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Karel Novacek | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Patrik Kuhnen | Match data |
| Oct 16, 1986* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Patrik Kuhnen | 7-6 7-6 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Patrik Kuhnen | #1,341 | #43 | 574 | 1,787 | 126 | 151 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Patrik Kuhnen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #86 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #89 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #119 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #189 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #187 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #504 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |