H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 0-3
Richard Krajicek holds a 3–0 lead over Karel Novacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1995 US Open first round 6-3 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| May 25, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Richard Krajicek | 6-1 7-5 7-5 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| Jun 4, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Richard Krajicek | 3-6 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 |