H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Slava Dosedel H2H: 2-1
Karel Novacek holds a 2–1 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Karel Novacek leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Karel Novacek won the 1994 Buenos Aires quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1994* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Karel Novacek | 6-1 6-3 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| May 4, 1994* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-3 7-5 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Karel Novacek | 7-5 6-4 7-5 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Karel Novacek | Slava Dosedel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 |
| 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 |