H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs V. Pecci H2H: 0-1
V. Pecci holds a 1–0 lead over Karel Novacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, V. Pecci leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, V. Pecci won the 1986 Madrid third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1986* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | V. Pecci | 6-4 7-5 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| V. Pecci | #666 | #9 | 0 | 2,085 | 354 | 244 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | V. Pecci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 46–29 | 61.3% | #34 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #39 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #11 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #29 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #38 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #110 | 1,607 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 1986 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,545 | 0 | 10 |