H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Wayne Ferreira H2H: 0-2
Wayne Ferreira holds a 2–0 lead over Karel Novacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 1992 Stuttgart Outdoor semifinal 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 1992* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Wayne Ferreira | 6-3 6-2 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Wayne Ferreira | 3-6 6-3 7-6(6) 7-6(7) | Karel Novacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Wayne Ferreira | #1,099 | #6 | 2,701 | 2,022 | 483 | 314 | 60.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Wayne Ferreira | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 55–25 | 68.8% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #10 | 1,838 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 13 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 13 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 13 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,895 | 0 | 14 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 2002 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,811 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,692 | 0 | 15 |