H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Wojtek Fibak H2H: 1-0
Karel Novacek holds a 1–0 lead over Wojtek Fibak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karel Novacek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Karel Novacek won the 1987 Gstaad third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 1987* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Karel Novacek | 6-3 6-4 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Wojtek Fibak | #566 | #10 | 0 | 2,089 | 520 | 309 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Karel Novacek | Wojtek Fibak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 |
| 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 |
| 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 |
| 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 |
| 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 |
| 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 |
| 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 |
| 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 |
| 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 |