H2H data updated: 2026-09-24 00:00 UTC

Karen Khachanov vs Bernard Tomic H2H: 0-1

Bernard Tomic holds a 1–0 lead over Karen Khachanov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernard Tomic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2026 Los Cabos Open second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karen Khachanov
Russia Age 30 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bernard Tomic #171 6-2 6-4 Karen Khachanov #26 Match data Jul 29, 2026 R16 Los Cabos Open ATP 250 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karen Khachanov #26 #8 3,280 2,096 322 234 57.9% 0 1 0 0 6 7
Bernard Tomic #182 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karen Khachanov Bernard Tomic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0
17 2013 3–2 60.0% #451 1,558 0 0 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0
18 2014 0–2 0.0% #372 1,533 0 0 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0
20 2016 13–9 59.1% #53 1,782 0 1 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1
21 2017 24–27 47.1% #45 1,798 0 1 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2
22 2018 44–22 66.7% #11 2,096 0 4 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3
23 2019 27–26 50.9% #17 1,909 0 4 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3
24 2020 16–14 53.3% #20 1,863 0 4 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3
25 2021 35–24 59.3% #29 1,906 0 4 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4
26 2022 37–25 59.7% #20 1,974 0 4 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4
27 2023 34–18 65.4% #15 1,958 0 5 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4
28 2024 37–22 62.7% #19 1,939 0 7 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4
29 2025 32–24 57.1% #17 1,869 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2026 20–19 51.3% #26 1,853 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2026 2–1 66.7% #182 1,560 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karen Khachanov Bernard Tomic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 2013 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 2016 8 5 13 61.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2017 6 17 23 26.1% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2018 33 15 48 68.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
23 2019 16 17 33 48.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
24 2020 12 11 23 52.2% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 2021 25 15 40 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2022 23 16 39 59.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2023 24 13 37 64.9% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2024 28 15 43 65.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2025 15 15 30 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2026 12 11 23 52.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
Career — 205 154 359 57.1% 83 60 143 58.0% 34 20 54 63.0% — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 548/559 of Karen Khachanov's and 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Karen Khachanov Bernard Tomic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2%
17 2013 5/5 6.6 2.6 62.1% 67.8% 49.4% 60.4% 45.8% 61.5% 33.5% 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8%
18 2014 2/2 4.5 3.5 58.8% 60.3% 42.0% 55.0% 41.7% 52.7% 31.3% 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1%
20 2016 22/22 8.4 3.1 56.9% 74.4% 52.0% 61.7% 42.2% 64.8% 37.5% 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7%
21 2017 51/51 8.0 3.6 56.1% 74.5% 50.3% 56.4% 36.7% 63.8% 35.8% 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0%
22 2018 66/66 9.9 2.3 64.2% 76.7% 53.9% 65.5% 47.1% 68.4% 38.0% 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2%
23 2019 53/53 7.6 3.2 62.0% 72.9% 52.0% 60.0% 41.5% 65.0% 35.6% 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1%
24 2020 30/30 6.5 2.8 63.1% 70.5% 52.6% 53.8% 48.0% 63.8% 37.2% 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1%
25 2021 53/59 7.4 2.6 62.9% 73.2% 51.6% 65.8% 38.3% 65.5% 37.2% 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6%
26 2022 61/62 7.8 2.6 64.2% 73.5% 50.7% 61.8% 42.8% 65.3% 35.7% 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6%
27 2023 52/52 7.0 1.9 63.8% 74.7% 54.2% 62.1% 45.4% 67.1% 38.6% 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6%
28 2024 58/59 7.7 1.7 64.8% 74.9% 53.0% 60.8% 46.8% 67.1% 36.8% 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6%
29 2025 56/56 7.0 2.4 62.8% 74.4% 52.6% 54.4% 41.1% 66.2% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2026 39/42 8.1 2.2 65.0% 75.0% 54.5% 64.4% 39.7% 67.7% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3%
Career — 548/559 7.8 2.5 62.6% 74.1% 52.4% 60.8% 42.8% 66.0% 36.9% — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karen Khachanov Bernard Tomic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09
17 2013 1559 113.0 -2.60 -0.02 0.870 48.3% +23 — — 54.5% -0.27 1–0 2–0 — +0.17 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20
18 2014 1534 102.1 -1.81 -2.67 0.661 42.6% — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–2 2–0 — +0.11 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) 110.1 -0.34
19 2015 1532 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 102.8 -1.42
20 2016 1783 138.3 +0.69 +0.76 1.064 51.2% -29 -138 — 56.9% +0.40 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 99.6 -0.21 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.0 -1.00
21 2017 1798 152.4 +0.87 -0.10 0.991 49.7% -157 +54 -48 46.6% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 15–19 (44%) 102.3 -1.26 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) 99.3 -0.73
22 2018 2097 171.1 +4.24 +2.57 1.202 52.9% -42 -192 -202 63.7% +0.89 9–9 (50%) 20–22 (48%) 103.6 -2.29 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) 98.4 +2.35
23 2019 1910 158.9 +0.91 +0.70 1.015 49.9% -3 +53 -8 50.0% +0.03 10–10 (50%) 13–18 (42%) 93.6 +0.67 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) 98.6 +2.21
24 2020 1863 151.9 +0.79 +0.51 1.027 50.3% -16 +105 — 54.9% +0.16 5–9 (36%) 11–7 (61%) 95.1 +0.60 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) 98.6 -0.82
25 2021 1906 157.9 +2.03 +1.16 1.078 51.3% 0 +21 +25 59.0% +0.45 11–15 (42%) 18–12 (60%) 96.3 -1.74 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) 102.2 +1.42
26 2022 1974 159.4 +2.13 +0.62 1.029 50.4% -11 +2 -45 53.7% +0.19 14–6 (70%) 13–16 (45%) 102.9 -1.74 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 -0.65
27 2023 1958 159.2 +3.28 +2.73 1.170 52.4% -10 +63 — 61.4% +0.73 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) 102.6 -0.40 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03
28 2024 1940 156.0 +2.89 +1.58 1.119 51.6% +22 +56 -89 59.6% +0.53 8–10 (44%) 19–12 (61%) 97.1 +3.23 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
29 2025 1869 154.2 +1.94 +2.47 1.122 51.7% -18 +90 +60 56.7% +0.50 11–15 (42%) 15–14 (52%) 93.5 +0.50 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2026 1854 141.9 +2.88 +0.17 1.127 51.8% +2 +11 +22 53.4% +0.55 8–9 (47%) 8–17 (32%) 91.4 +2.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1561 105.1 -0.80 +1.09 1.034 51.0% +26 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24
Career — 2097 161.9 +2.17 +1.29 1.084 51.2% -19 +18 -27 56.1% +0.39 97–104 (48%) 152–152 (50%) 95.5 +0.05 — 1973 147.1 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.