H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karen Khachanov vs Botic van de Zandschulp H2H: 2-1
Karen Khachanov holds a 2–1 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Karen Khachanov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Karen Khachanov won the 2026 Internazionali BNL d'Italia third round 5-7 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2026 | Internazionali BNL d'Italia | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Karen Khachanov | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2023* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 7-5 6-2 | Karen Khachanov | Match data |
| Feb 6, 2021* | Great Ocean Road Open | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Karen Khachanov | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Khachanov | #26 | #8 | 3,280 | 2,096 | 312 | 229 | 57.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karen Khachanov | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #451 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #45 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #11 | 2,096 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #29 | 1,877 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,959 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #19 | 1,938 | 0 | 7 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 7 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |