H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Karen Khachanov vs Di Wu H2H: 1-0
Karen Khachanov holds a 1–0 lead over Di Wu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karen Khachanov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karen Khachanov won the 2017 Beijing third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2017* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Karen Khachanov | 6-4 6-2 | Di Wu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Khachanov | #26 | #8 | 3,280 | 2,096 | 312 | 229 | 57.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Di Wu | #1,143 | #140 | 409 | 1,555 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Karen Khachanov | Di Wu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #451 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #45 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #11 | 2,096 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #29 | 1,877 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #244 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,959 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #19 | 1,938 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |