H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Karen Khachanov vs Gilles Muller H2H: 0-1
Gilles Muller holds a 1–0 lead over Karen Khachanov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gilles Muller leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2016 Chennai third round 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
LUX
Age 43
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2016* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Gilles Muller | 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-2 | Karen Khachanov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Khachanov | #26 | #8 | 3,280 | 2,096 | 312 | 229 | 57.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Gilles Muller | #966 | #21 | 1,930 | 2,071 | 200 | 199 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karen Khachanov | Gilles Muller | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #451 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #45 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #11 | 2,096 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #29 | 1,877 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #95 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #248 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,959 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #19 | 1,938 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #54 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #368 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #47 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #34 | 1,956 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #25 | 1,939 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #138 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |