H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Karen Khachanov vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 1-0

Karen Khachanov holds a 1–0 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karen Khachanov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Karen Khachanov won the 2018 Roland Garros second round 6-2 7-6(7) 6-7(0) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karen Khachanov
Russia Age 30 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Karen Khachanov #38 6-2 7-6(7) 6-7(0) 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #67 Match data May 31, 2018* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karen Khachanov #50 #8 3,280 2,096 322 234 57.9% 0 1 0 0 6 7
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karen Khachanov Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2013 3–2 60.0% #451 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2014 0–2 0.0% #372 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2016 13–9 59.1% #53 1,782 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2017 24–27 47.1% #45 1,798 0 1 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2018 44–22 66.7% #11 2,096 0 4 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2019 27–26 50.9% #17 1,909 0 4 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0
24 2020 16–14 53.3% #20 1,863 0 4 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0
25 2021 35–24 59.3% #29 1,906 0 4 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0
26 2022 37–25 59.7% #20 1,974 0 4 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1
27 2023 34–18 65.4% #15 1,958 0 5 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2
28 2024 37–22 62.7% #19 1,939 0 7 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2025 32–24 57.1% #17 1,869 0 7 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2
30 2026 20–19 51.3% #50 1,853 0 7 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karen Khachanov Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2013 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 8 5 13 61.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2017 6 17 23 26.1% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2018 33 15 48 68.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2019 16 17 33 48.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2020 12 11 23 52.2% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2021 25 15 40 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2022 23 16 39 59.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
27 2023 24 13 37 64.9% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2024 28 15 43 65.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2025 15 15 30 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2026 12 11 23 52.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 205 154 359 57.1% 83 60 143 58.0% 34 20 54 63.0% — — — — — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 548/558 of Karen Khachanov's and 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Karen Khachanov Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2013 5/5 6.6 2.6 62.1% 67.8% 49.4% 60.4% 45.8% 61.5% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 2/2 4.5 3.5 58.8% 60.3% 42.0% 55.0% 41.7% 52.7% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 22/22 8.4 3.1 56.9% 74.4% 52.0% 61.7% 42.2% 64.8% 37.5% 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3%
21 2017 51/51 8.0 3.6 56.1% 74.5% 50.3% 56.4% 36.7% 63.8% 35.8% 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2%
22 2018 66/66 9.9 2.3 64.2% 76.7% 53.9% 65.5% 47.1% 68.4% 38.0% 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1%
23 2019 53/53 7.6 3.2 62.0% 72.9% 52.0% 60.0% 41.5% 65.0% 35.6% 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7%
24 2020 30/30 6.5 2.8 63.1% 70.5% 52.6% 53.8% 48.0% 63.8% 37.2% 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9%
25 2021 53/59 7.4 2.6 62.9% 73.2% 51.6% 65.8% 38.3% 65.5% 37.2% 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9%
26 2022 61/62 7.8 2.6 64.2% 73.5% 50.7% 61.8% 42.8% 65.3% 35.7% 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4%
27 2023 52/52 7.0 1.9 63.8% 74.7% 54.2% 62.1% 45.4% 67.1% 38.6% 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7%
28 2024 58/59 7.7 1.7 64.8% 74.9% 53.0% 60.8% 46.8% 67.1% 36.8% 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8%
29 2025 56/56 7.0 2.4 62.8% 74.4% 52.6% 54.4% 41.1% 66.2% 37.9% 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7%
30 2026 39/41 8.1 2.2 65.0% 75.0% 54.5% 64.4% 39.7% 67.7% 36.3% 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0%
Career — 548/558 7.8 2.5 62.6% 74.1% 52.4% 60.8% 42.8% 66.0% 36.9% — 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karen Khachanov Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2013 1559 113.0 -2.60 -0.02 0.870 48.3% +23 — — 54.5% -0.27 1–0 2–0 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1534 102.1 -1.81 -2.67 0.661 42.6% — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–2 2–0 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2015 1532 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 1783 138.3 +0.69 +0.76 1.064 51.2% -29 -138 — 56.9% +0.40 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 99.6 -0.21 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27
21 2017 1798 152.4 +0.87 -0.10 0.991 49.7% -157 +54 -48 46.6% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 15–19 (44%) 102.3 -1.26 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99
22 2018 2097 171.1 +4.24 +2.57 1.202 52.9% -42 -192 -202 63.7% +0.89 9–9 (50%) 20–22 (48%) 103.6 -2.29 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39
23 2019 1910 158.9 +0.91 +0.70 1.015 49.9% -3 +53 -8 50.0% +0.03 10–10 (50%) 13–18 (42%) 93.6 +0.67 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42
24 2020 1863 151.9 +0.79 +0.51 1.027 50.3% -16 +105 — 54.9% +0.16 5–9 (36%) 11–7 (61%) 95.1 +0.60 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03
25 2021 1906 157.9 +2.03 +1.16 1.078 51.3% 0 +21 +25 59.0% +0.45 11–15 (42%) 18–12 (60%) 96.3 -1.74 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38
26 2022 1974 159.4 +2.13 +0.62 1.029 50.4% -11 +2 -45 53.7% +0.19 14–6 (70%) 13–16 (45%) 102.9 -1.74 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24
27 2023 1958 159.2 +3.28 +2.73 1.170 52.4% -10 +63 — 61.4% +0.73 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) 102.6 -0.40 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40
28 2024 1940 156.0 +2.89 +1.58 1.119 51.6% +22 +56 -89 59.6% +0.53 8–10 (44%) 19–12 (61%) 97.1 +3.23 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22
29 2025 1869 154.2 +1.94 +2.47 1.122 51.7% -18 +90 +60 56.7% +0.50 11–15 (42%) 15–14 (52%) 93.5 +0.50 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76
30 2026 1854 141.9 +2.93 +0.28 1.127 51.8% +1 +10 +22 53.4% +0.55 8–9 (47%) 8–17 (32%) 91.4 +2.64 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2097 161.9 +2.18 +1.30 1.084 51.2% -19 +18 -27 56.1% +0.39 97–104 (48%) 152–152 (50%) 95.5 +0.05 — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.