H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Karen Khachanov vs Jakub Mensik H2H: 2-1
Karen Khachanov holds a 2–1 lead over Jakub Mensik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Karen Khachanov leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jakub Mensik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jakub Mensik won the 2026 Mutua Madrid Open third round 6-4 7-6(11).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Czechia
Age 20
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026 | Mutua Madrid Open | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jakub Mensik | 6-4 7-6(11) | Karen Khachanov | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2025* | BNP Paribas Open | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Karen Khachanov | 3-6 6-0 6-3 | Jakub Mensik | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2024* | Doha | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Karen Khachanov | 7-6(12) 6-4 | Jakub Mensik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Khachanov | #26 | #8 | 3,280 | 2,096 | 312 | 229 | 57.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Jakub Mensik | #19 | #12 | 2,650 | 1,986 | 78 | 46 | 62.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karen Khachanov | Jakub Mensik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #451 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #167 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #48 | 1,847 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #19 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2017 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #45 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #11 | 2,096 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #29 | 1,877 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,959 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #19 | 1,938 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |