H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karen Khachanov vs Jaume Munar H2H: 2-1
Karen Khachanov holds a 2–1 lead over Jaume Munar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Karen Khachanov leads 2–0 on clay, while Jaume Munar leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaume Munar won the 2026 ABN AMRO Open fourth round 7-6(8) 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 29
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | ABN AMRO Open | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Jaume Munar | 7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | Karen Khachanov | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2025* | Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Karen Khachanov | 7-5 6-4 | Jaume Munar | Match data |
| May 7, 2019* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Karen Khachanov | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | Jaume Munar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Khachanov | #26 | #8 | 3,280 | 2,096 | 312 | 229 | 57.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Jaume Munar | #44 | #33 | 1,395 | 1,887 | 129 | 164 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karen Khachanov | Jaume Munar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #451 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #45 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #81 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #11 | 2,096 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #110 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #77 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #29 | 1,877 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,959 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #19 | 1,938 | 0 | 7 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 7 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |