H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:17 UTC
Karen Khachanov vs Jesper de Jong H2H: 1-1
Karen Khachanov and Jesper de Jong are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jesper de Jong leads 1–0 on clay, while Karen Khachanov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jesper de Jong won the 2026 Roland Garros third round 7-5 5-7 6-2 6-7(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 26
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2026 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Jesper de Jong | 7-5 5-7 6-2 6-7(2) 6-2 | Karen Khachanov | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2026 | ABN AMRO Open | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Karen Khachanov | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | Jesper de Jong | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Khachanov | #26 | #8 | 3,280 | 2,096 | 312 | 229 | 57.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Jesper de Jong | #73 | #71 | 821 | 1,766 | 24 | 32 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karen Khachanov | Jesper de Jong | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #451 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #45 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #11 | 2,096 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #112 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #29 | 1,877 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #73 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,959 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #19 | 1,938 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |