H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Karen Khachanov vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 1-1
Karen Khachanov and Lukas Rosol are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Karen Khachanov won the 2018 Moscow fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2018* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Karen Khachanov | 6-4 7-5 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
| Sep 20, 2013* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Lukas Rosol | 6-4 6-4 | Karen Khachanov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Khachanov | #26 | #8 | 3,280 | 2,096 | 312 | 229 | 57.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karen Khachanov | Lukas Rosol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #451 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #45 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #11 | 2,096 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #29 | 1,877 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,959 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #19 | 1,938 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |