H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Karen Khachanov vs Peter Gojowczyk H2H: 1-1

Karen Khachanov and Peter Gojowczyk are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Gojowczyk won the 2021 Metz round of 16 6-3 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karen Khachanov
Russia Age 30 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Peter Gojowczyk
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Peter Gojowczyk #101 6-3 7-6(2) Karen Khachanov #27 Match data Sep 24, 2021* R16 Metz ATP 250 Hard
Karen Khachanov #11 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-3 Peter Gojowczyk #63 Match data Jan 16, 2019* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karen Khachanov #50 #8 3,280 2,096 318 233 57.7% 0 1 0 0 6 7
Peter Gojowczyk #1,284 #39 1,175 1,884 75 97 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karen Khachanov Peter Gojowczyk
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2013 3–2 60.0% #451 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2014 0–2 0.0% #372 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2016 13–9 59.1% #53 1,782 0 1 2010 0–1 0.0% #494 1,515 0 0
21 2017 24–27 47.1% #45 1,798 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2018 44–22 66.7% #11 2,096 0 4 2012 0–1 0.0% #181 1,585 0 0
23 2019 27–26 50.9% #17 1,909 0 4 2013 1–1 50.0% #162 1,609 0 0
24 2020 16–14 53.3% #20 1,863 0 4 2014 7–8 46.7% #79 1,697 0 0
25 2021 35–24 59.3% #29 1,906 0 4 2015 1–3 25.0% #194 1,652 0 0
26 2022 37–25 59.7% #20 1,974 0 4 2016 1–2 33.3% #189 1,678 0 0
27 2023 34–18 65.4% #15 1,958 0 5 2017 14–9 60.9% #60 1,809 0 1
28 2024 37–22 62.7% #19 1,939 0 7 2018 23–25 47.9% #59 1,800 0 1
29 2025 32–24 57.1% #17 1,869 0 7 2019 10–21 32.3% #117 1,672 0 1
30 2026 16–18 47.1% #50 1,736 0 7 2020 1–3 25.0% #145 1,622 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2021 13–9 59.1% #86 1,757 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2022 4–14 22.2% #235 1,574 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karen Khachanov Peter Gojowczyk
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2013 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 8 5 13 61.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2017 6 17 23 26.1% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2018 33 15 48 68.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2019 16 17 33 48.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2020 12 11 23 52.2% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2014 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2021 25 15 40 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2022 23 16 39 59.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2016 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
27 2023 24 13 37 64.9% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — 2017 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2024 28 15 43 65.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2018 17 17 34 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2025 15 15 30 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2019 8 14 22 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
30 2026 8 10 18 44.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career — 201 153 354 56.8% 83 60 143 58.0% 34 20 54 63.0% — 56 66 122 45.9% 7 17 24 29.2% 12 14 26 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 543/554 of Karen Khachanov's and 171/172 of Peter Gojowczyk's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Karen Khachanov Peter Gojowczyk
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2013 5/5 6.6 2.6 62.1% 67.8% 49.4% 60.4% 45.8% 61.5% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 2/2 4.5 3.5 58.8% 60.3% 42.0% 55.0% 41.7% 52.7% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 22/22 8.4 3.1 56.9% 74.4% 52.0% 61.7% 42.2% 64.8% 37.5% 2010 1/1 1.0 5.0 64.3% 47.6% 51.4% 30.0% 50.0% 49.0% 38.7%
21 2017 51/51 8.0 3.6 56.1% 74.5% 50.3% 56.4% 36.7% 63.8% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2018 66/66 9.9 2.3 64.2% 76.7% 53.9% 65.5% 47.1% 68.4% 38.0% 2012 1/1 4.0 4.0 58.5% 56.9% 43.1% 47.1% 44.4% 51.2% 38.5%
23 2019 53/53 7.6 3.2 62.0% 72.9% 52.0% 60.0% 41.5% 65.0% 35.6% 2013 2/2 11.5 7.0 53.5% 76.7% 50.7% 63.1% 47.3% 64.8% 39.4%
24 2020 30/30 6.5 2.8 63.1% 70.5% 52.6% 53.8% 48.0% 63.8% 37.2% 2014 15/15 7.4 3.5 57.4% 74.7% 50.2% 69.6% 49.6% 64.1% 35.1%
25 2021 53/59 7.4 2.6 62.9% 73.2% 51.6% 65.8% 38.3% 65.5% 37.2% 2015 4/4 6.5 3.0 54.2% 72.3% 48.8% 60.7% 35.4% 61.5% 41.3%
26 2022 61/62 7.8 2.6 64.2% 73.5% 50.7% 61.8% 42.8% 65.3% 35.7% 2016 3/3 13.3 1.7 61.2% 75.8% 48.3% 70.8% 37.5% 65.1% 26.5%
27 2023 52/52 7.0 1.9 63.8% 74.7% 54.2% 62.1% 45.4% 67.1% 38.6% 2017 23/23 7.6 4.1 54.1% 78.0% 48.0% 53.8% 54.0% 64.1% 37.2%
28 2024 58/59 7.7 1.7 64.8% 74.9% 53.0% 60.8% 46.8% 67.1% 36.8% 2018 48/48 6.9 3.3 54.2% 75.4% 49.2% 55.9% 36.1% 63.2% 35.3%
29 2025 56/56 7.0 2.4 62.8% 74.4% 52.6% 54.4% 41.1% 66.2% 37.9% 2019 31/31 6.2 4.0 54.0% 70.0% 45.3% 54.6% 40.8% 58.7% 33.9%
30 2026 34/37 8.0 1.9 66.1% 74.3% 54.6% 63.6% 37.4% 67.5% 35.9% 2020 4/4 9.3 4.5 57.1% 72.9% 50.7% 50.0% 26.7% 63.2% 33.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 22/22 7.6 5.1 51.7% 78.0% 48.0% 65.7% 38.3% 63.5% 35.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 17/18 3.9 4.5 52.9% 65.5% 44.5% 51.3% 38.3% 55.6% 32.1%
Career — 543/554 7.8 2.5 62.7% 74.1% 52.4% 60.8% 42.6% 65.9% 36.9% — 171/172 6.9 4.0 54.2% 73.7% 47.8% 57.5% 41.1% 61.7% 35.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karen Khachanov Peter Gojowczyk
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2013 1559 113.0 -2.60 -0.02 0.870 48.3% +23 — — 54.5% -0.27 1–0 2–0 — +0.17 2007 1484 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1534 102.1 -1.81 -2.67 0.661 42.6% — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–2 2–0 — +0.11 2008 1463 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2015 1532 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 1783 138.3 +0.69 +0.76 1.064 51.2% -29 -138 — 56.9% +0.40 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.21 2010 1516 104.5 +0.44 +1.12 0.759 45.0% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.20
21 2017 1798 152.4 +0.87 -0.10 0.991 49.7% -157 +54 -48 46.6% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 15–19 (44%) — -1.26 2011 1506 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2018 2097 171.1 +4.24 +2.57 1.202 52.9% -42 -192 -202 63.7% +0.89 9–9 (50%) 20–22 (48%) — -2.29 2012 1585 118.6 -1.08 -5.85 0.788 45.0% — — — 40.0% -1.20 0–1 — — -0.02
23 2019 1910 158.9 +0.91 +0.70 1.015 49.9% -3 +53 -8 50.0% +0.03 10–10 (50%) 13–18 (42%) — +0.67 2013 1610 112.7 -1.87 +0.62 1.118 51.5% — — — 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–0 — +0.36
24 2020 1863 151.9 +0.79 +0.51 1.027 50.3% -16 +105 — 54.9% +0.16 5–9 (36%) 11–7 (61%) — +0.60 2014 1697 138.1 +0.13 +0.88 0.980 50.0% +27 -187 -115 47.4% -0.16 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.47
25 2021 1906 157.9 +2.03 +1.16 1.078 51.3% 0 +21 +25 59.0% +0.45 11–15 (42%) 18–12 (60%) — -1.74 2015 1653 118.0 +0.17 +0.96 1.073 51.7% +47 — — 33.3% 0.00 — — — +0.08
26 2022 1974 159.4 +2.13 +0.62 1.029 50.4% -11 +2 -45 53.7% +0.19 14–6 (70%) 13–16 (45%) — -1.74 2016 1678 121.7 +1.67 -1.23 0.759 46.8% +42 — — 25.0% -0.88 1–0 0–2 — -0.59
27 2023 1958 159.2 +3.28 +2.73 1.170 52.4% -10 +63 — 61.4% +0.73 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) — -0.40 2017 1810 134.4 -0.07 +0.58 1.038 50.9% -21 — -60 55.2% +0.15 6–4 (60%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.94
28 2024 1940 156.0 +2.89 +1.58 1.119 51.6% +22 +56 -89 59.6% +0.53 8–10 (44%) 19–12 (61%) — +3.23 2018 1800 151.9 -0.36 -0.06 0.961 49.3% -3 -173 — 46.4% -0.20 11–3 (79%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.51
29 2025 1869 154.2 +1.94 +2.47 1.122 51.7% -18 +90 +60 56.7% +0.50 11–15 (42%) 15–14 (52%) — +0.50 2019 1672 144.1 -3.39 -1.36 0.820 46.7% +60 -106 +26 36.7% -0.85 5–7 (42%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.60
30 2026 1736 134.4 +2.54 -0.18 1.105 51.5% +5 +127 +138 51.0% +0.38 7–9 (44%) 8–13 (38%) — +2.94 2020 1623 120.0 -1.23 -1.08 0.921 48.9% +60 — — 30.8% -0.46 — 1–1 — +0.24
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1758 125.5 -0.63 -0.49 0.973 49.7% +19 — -47 54.1% +0.10 7–2 (78%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.90
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1575 116.4 -5.50 -2.19 0.723 44.1% +37 — +117 16.7% -2.36 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.26
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1567 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2097 161.6 +2.15 +1.28 1.082 51.2% -19 +28 -19 56.0% +0.37 96–104 (48%) 152–148 (51%) 95.8 +0.11 — 1885 137.5 -1.36 -0.43 0.916 48.6% +20 -162 -24 43.5% -0.44 32–21 (60%) 29–37 (44%) 103.1 -0.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.