H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Karen Khachanov vs Peter Polansky H2H: 1-0
Karen Khachanov holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Polansky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karen Khachanov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karen Khachanov won the 2018 Australian Open first round 7-6(3) 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Karen Khachanov | 7-6(3) 7-6(2) 6-4 | Peter Polansky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Khachanov | #26 | #8 | 3,280 | 2,096 | 312 | 229 | 57.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Peter Polansky | #1,475 | #110 | 495 | 1,676 | 11 | 39 | 22.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karen Khachanov | Peter Polansky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #451 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #821 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #45 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #185 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #11 | 2,096 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #29 | 1,877 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,959 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #19 | 1,938 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #119 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |