H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Karen Khachanov vs Philipp Kohlschreiber H2H: 2-3

Philipp Kohlschreiber holds a 3–2 lead over Karen Khachanov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Karen Khachanov won the 2019 Moscow fourth round 3-6 6-3 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karen Khachanov
Russia Age 30 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Philipp Kohlschreiber
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 18, 2019* Moscow ATP 250 R16 Hard Karen Khachanov #8 3-6 6-3 7-6(7) Philipp Kohlschreiber #76 Match data
May 3, 2019* Munich ATP 250 R16 Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #41 7-6(6) 6-4 Karen Khachanov #13 Match data
May 15, 2018* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #28 7-5 6-7(7) 7-6(6) Karen Khachanov #36 Match data
Feb 15, 2018* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Philipp Kohlschreiber #36 3-6 7-6(1) 7-6(5) Karen Khachanov #48 Match data
Jul 21, 2016* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Karen Khachanov #104 6-4 6-4 Philipp Kohlschreiber #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Karen Khachanov #26 #8 3,280 2,096 312 229 57.7% 0 1 0 0 6 7
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,054 444 372 54.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karen Khachanov Philipp Kohlschreiber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2013 3–2 60.0% #451 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2014 0–2 0.0% #372 1,534 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0
20 2016 13–9 59.1% #53 1,783 0 1 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,562 0 0
21 2017 24–27 47.1% #45 1,797 0 1 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,538 0 0
22 2018 44–22 66.7% #11 2,096 0 4 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,653 0 0
23 2019 27–26 50.9% #17 1,909 0 4 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,767 0 1
24 2020 16–14 53.3% #20 1,864 0 4 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,857 0 2
25 2021 30–23 56.6% #29 1,877 0 4 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,833 0 2
26 2022 37–25 59.7% #20 1,975 0 4 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,851 0 2
27 2023 34–18 65.4% #15 1,959 0 5 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,848 0 3
28 2024 37–22 62.7% #19 1,938 0 7 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,888 0 4
29 2025 32–24 57.1% #17 1,867 0 7 2013 33–24 57.9% #22 1,937 0 4
30 2026 15–15 50.0% #26 1,781 0 7 2014 32–25 56.1% #24 1,899 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,972 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2016 29–22 56.9% #32 1,874 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,957 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,886 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,787 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,725 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 7–8 46.7% #114 1,717 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 7