H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Karen Khachanov vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 1-1
Karen Khachanov and Viktor Troicki are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Viktor Troicki leads 1–0 on clay, while Karen Khachanov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2017 Istanbul fourth round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2017* | Istanbul | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Viktor Troicki | 6-4 7-6(5) | Karen Khachanov | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2016* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Karen Khachanov | 6-3 7-5 | Viktor Troicki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Khachanov | #26 | #8 | 3,280 | 2,096 | 312 | 229 | 57.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,008 | 268 | 256 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karen Khachanov | Viktor Troicki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #451 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #45 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #11 | 2,096 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #29 | 1,877 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,959 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #75 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #19 | 1,938 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |