H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karim Alami vs Arnaud Boetsch H2H: 1-1
Karim Alami and Arnaud Boetsch are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Boetsch leads 1–0 on carpet, while Karim Alami leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arnaud Boetsch won the 1997 Milan third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1997* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Arnaud Boetsch | 6-2 6-2 | Karim Alami | Match data |
| May 26, 1995* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Karim Alami | 6-4 7-5 | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karim Alami | #1,418 | #25 | 1,196 | 1,798 | 140 | 177 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karim Alami | Arnaud Boetsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #73 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #56 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #55 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #72 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #203 | 1,512 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #479 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |