H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Karim Alami vs Cyril Saulnier H2H: 1-0
Karim Alami holds a 1–0 lead over Cyril Saulnier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karim Alami leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karim Alami won the 2000 Indianapolis second round 6-4 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2000 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Karim Alami | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Cyril Saulnier | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karim Alami | #1,418 | #25 | 1,196 | 1,798 | 140 | 177 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Cyril Saulnier | #1,013 | #48 | 798 | 1,800 | 75 | 111 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karim Alami | Cyril Saulnier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #73 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #56 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #55 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #130 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #72 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #86 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #203 | 1,512 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #479 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #90 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |