H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Karim Alami vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 0-1
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 1–0 lead over Karim Alami in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2000 Miami Masters second round 6-4 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2000* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | Karim Alami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karim Alami | #1,418 | #25 | 1,196 | 1,798 | 140 | 177 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karim Alami | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #73 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #56 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #55 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #72 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #203 | 1,512 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #479 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 |