H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Karim Alami vs Jim Grabb H2H: 0-1
Jim Grabb holds a 1–0 lead over Karim Alami in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1994 Indianapolis second round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1994 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jim Grabb | 7-5 6-0 | Karim Alami | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karim Alami | #1,418 | #25 | 1,196 | 1,798 | 140 | 177 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karim Alami | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #73 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #56 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #55 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #72 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #203 | 1,512 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #479 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |