H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Karim Alami vs Jim Grabb H2H: 0-1

Jim Grabb holds a 1–0 lead over Karim Alami in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1994 Indianapolis round of 64 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karim Alami
MAR Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Grabb #100 7-5 6-0 Karim Alami #95 Match data Aug 17, 1994* R64 Indianapolis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karim Alami #1,418 #25 1,196 1,799 143 179 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karim Alami Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 0–1 0.0% #340 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1992 0–3 0.0% #437 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 2–2 50.0% #205 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1994 12–19 38.7% #88 1,506 0 0 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1995 15–14 51.7% #73 1,616 0 0 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1996 16–21 43.2% #56 1,652 0 2 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1997 23–27 46.0% #55 1,619 0 2 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1998 19–21 47.5% #72 1,655 0 2 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1999 26–22 54.2% #31 1,735 0 2 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1
27 2000 24–29 45.3% #57 1,642 0 2 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1
28 2001 5–17 22.7% #203 1,526 0 2 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2
29 2002 1–2 33.3% #479 1,533 0 2 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 2003 0–1 0.0% #990 1,520 0 2 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karim Alami Jim Grabb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 4 4 8 50.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1995 4 4 8 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1996 1 6 7 14.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1997 0 4 4 0.0% 21 19 40 52.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1999 3 4 7 42.9% 22 15 37 59.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 2000 13 15 28 46.4% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
28 2001 0 6 6 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% — — — — — — — — 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6%
29 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 28 50 78 35.9% 109 106 215 50.7% 5 10 15 33.3% 1 13 14 7.1% — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 270/321 of Karim Alami's and 169/198 of Jim Grabb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Karim Alami Jim Grabb
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1992 2/3 2.5 1.0 58.7% 65.0% 51.2% 39.3% 62.5% 58.9% 33.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 4/4 5.0 1.3 55.4% 64.2% 39.4% 54.3% 45.4% 53.2% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 25/31 3.5 2.3 52.9% 68.7% 48.3% 60.2% 44.1% 59.4% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 27/29 4.4 2.2 50.9% 72.1% 48.6% 55.7% 38.0% 60.4% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 36/37 4.6 3.4 54.3% 72.3% 47.6% 52.1% 47.8% 60.8% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 47/50 3.9 2.6 56.4% 71.1% 48.1% 57.7% 39.6% 60.9% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 34/40 4.2 2.8 59.4% 69.2% 46.6% 53.8% 38.7% 60.0% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 34/48 4.9 2.9 57.0% 69.6% 49.9% 55.9% 45.3% 61.0% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 39/53 5.2 3.8 56.9% 72.4% 49.7% 54.0% 39.6% 62.6% 35.8% 1991 37/42 7.0 4.0 64.9% 72.2% 48.6% 59.8% 37.6% 64.1% 36.3%
28 2001 19/22 3.9 3.2 57.9% 66.2% 46.8% 61.6% 40.2% 57.6% 35.1% 1992 50/55 6.4 3.1 64.6% 75.8% 47.8% 54.4% 35.0% 66.0% 35.6%
29 2002 2/3 2.0 1.5 60.7% 64.1% 57.5% 40.0% 0.0% 61.5% 25.6% 1993 13/15 5.1 3.0 70.6% 65.7% 48.5% 60.1% 52.2% 59.9% 35.2%
30 2003 1/1 5.0 0.0 60.8% 68.9% 37.9% 42.9% 75.0% 56.8% 34.6% 1994 33/38 5.2 3.0 68.5% 69.1% 45.9% 59.0% 49.0% 61.9% 35.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 20/23 5.7 2.9 64.8% 68.9% 47.3% 65.1% 27.2% 61.3% 32.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 10/16 7.1 5.5 65.1% 74.5% 44.0% 58.1% 52.2% 63.5% 33.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 6/9 4.3 6.5 63.9% 71.6% 34.5% 48.0% 42.7% 58.1% 32.5%
Career — 270/322 4.4 2.8 55.9% 70.4% 48.2% 55.6% 41.7% 60.5% 37.4% — 169/378 6.1 3.5 65.9% 71.9% 46.9% 58.2% 40.0% 63.3% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karim Alami Jim Grabb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1488 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1459 103.2 -1.47 -0.13 0.807 46.6% — +29 — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1475 106.9 -3.07 -2.89 0.920 48.5% — +38 — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 1506 125.9 -1.21 -0.48 0.959 49.2% +61 -2 +91 40.0% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 8–5 (62%) — +1.14 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16
22 1995 1617 122.6 -0.13 -0.28 0.984 49.7% -30 +10 — 50.7% +0.06 5–5 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.51 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05
23 1996 1653 128.3 -0.43 -2.34 0.903 48.3% -161 +80 — 39.5% -0.74 6–2 (75%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.91 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31
24 1997 1620 129.9 +0.05 +0.05 0.989 49.4% -162 +68 — 44.4% -0.40 8–7 (53%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.30 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31
25 1998 1655 137.2 -1.24 -0.31 0.931 48.5% -150 +116 — 46.4% -0.39 9–5 (64%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.32 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18
26 1999 1735 143.2 +0.18 +0.65 1.002 50.1% -212 +82 — 52.0% +0.21 10–8 (56%) 8–13 (38%) — -1.98 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10
27 2000 1643 133.0 +0.50 -0.95 0.955 49.2% -36 +70 -118 46.4% -0.29 11–12 (48%) 12–10 (55%) — +0.55 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72
28 2001 1527 113.0 -2.51 -1.95 0.829 46.3% -8 +94 — 24.1% -1.63 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.45 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42
29 2002 1534 103.3 -2.21 -3.26 0.666 43.0% — — — 33.3% -1.33 — 1–0 — -0.01 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36
30 2003 1521 102.9 -3.07 +0.46 0.800 45.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.07 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17
Career — 1800 135.3 -0.50 -0.67 0.946 48.9% -80 +67 -40 44.2% -0.40 53–47 (53%) 57–58 (50%) 104.7 +0.15 — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.