H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Karim Alami vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 1-1

Karim Alami and Markus Hipfl are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Markus Hipfl won the 2001 Austrian Open Kitzbühel round of 64 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karim Alami
MAR Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Markus Hipfl
AUT Age 48 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Markus Hipfl #100 6-4 6-2 Karim Alami #105 Match data Jul 25, 2001* R64 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Karim Alami #43 4-6 6-4 6-4 Markus Hipfl #69 Match data Oct 9, 1999* QF Palermo ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karim Alami #1,418 #25 1,196 1,799 143 179 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Markus Hipfl #1,538 #63 678 1,686 55 78 41.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karim Alami Markus Hipfl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #768 1,491 0 0
17 1990 0–1 0.0% #340 1,488 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #1275 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 1–2 33.3% #451 1,493 0 0
19 1992 0–3 0.0% #437 1,458 0 0 1997 0–2 0.0% #231 1,462 0 0
20 1993 2–2 50.0% #205 1,475 0 0 1998 3–3 50.0% #137 1,507 0 0
21 1994 12–19 38.7% #88 1,506 0 0 1999 15–15 50.0% #76 1,591 0 0
22 1995 15–14 51.7% #73 1,616 0 0 2000 8–12 40.0% #119 1,571 0 0
23 1996 16–21 43.2% #56 1,652 0 2 2001 14–18 43.8% #76 1,574 0 0
24 1997 23–27 46.0% #55 1,619 0 2 2002 11–17 39.3% #125 1,566 0 0
25 1998 19–21 47.5% #72 1,655 0 2 2003 3–6 33.3% #279 1,509 0 0
26 1999 26–22 54.2% #31 1,735 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2000 24–29 45.3% #57 1,642 0 2 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,476 0 0
28 2001 5–17 22.7% #203 1,526 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2002 1–2 33.3% #479 1,533 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2003 0–1 0.0% #990 1,520 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karim Alami Markus Hipfl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1992 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1993 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1994 4 4 8 50.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1995 4 4 8 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 1 4 5 20.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1996 1 6 7 14.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2001 0 5 5 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 1997 0 4 4 0.0% 21 19 40 52.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2002 3 4 7 42.9% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1999 3 4 7 42.9% 22 15 37 59.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 13 15 28 46.4% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2001 0 6 6 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 50 78 35.9% 109 106 215 50.7% 5 10 15 33.3% 1 13 14 7.1% — 5 17 22 22.7% 49 53 102 48.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 270/321 of Karim Alami's and 116/133 of Markus Hipfl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Karim Alami Markus Hipfl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 1/1 1.0 6.0 66.2% 57.8% 39.1% 71.4% 0.0% 51.5% 27.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 1/1 2.0 6.0 49.1% 51.9% 39.3% 16.7% 20.0% 45.5% 34.5%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 3/3 1.7 4.3 43.0% 62.8% 49.0% 60.8% 40.6% 54.8% 40.5%
19 1992 2/3 2.5 1.0 58.7% 65.0% 51.2% 39.3% 62.5% 58.9% 33.2% 1997 1/2 1.0 2.0 50.9% 62.1% 44.6% 50.0% 80.0% 53.5% 46.3%
20 1993 4/4 5.0 1.3 55.4% 64.2% 39.4% 54.3% 45.4% 53.2% 43.1% 1998 5/6 2.4 1.6 67.6% 60.0% 50.6% 51.0% 33.6% 56.7% 38.8%
21 1994 25/31 3.5 2.3 52.9% 68.7% 48.3% 60.2% 44.1% 59.4% 39.0% 1999 26/30 2.3 1.8 66.3% 66.5% 49.6% 37.2% 42.6% 61.0% 42.0%
22 1995 27/29 4.4 2.2 50.9% 72.1% 48.6% 55.7% 38.0% 60.4% 38.9% 2000 16/20 2.1 2.2 64.6% 64.9% 50.9% 54.0% 52.2% 59.7% 39.1%
23 1996 36/37 4.6 3.4 54.3% 72.3% 47.6% 52.1% 47.8% 60.8% 35.4% 2001 26/32 2.1 2.9 61.4% 63.6% 48.6% 51.5% 38.5% 58.1% 39.9%
24 1997 47/50 3.9 2.6 56.4% 71.1% 48.1% 57.7% 39.6% 60.9% 38.7% 2002 27/28 3.3 2.2 65.1% 63.3% 50.1% 50.8% 46.7% 58.2% 39.0%
25 1998 34/40 4.2 2.8 59.4% 69.2% 46.6% 53.8% 38.7% 60.0% 37.2% 2003 9/9 0.9 1.9 71.7% 56.3% 41.2% 46.4% 38.4% 52.0% 33.3%
26 1999 34/48 4.9 2.9 57.0% 69.6% 49.9% 55.9% 45.3% 61.0% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 39/53 5.2 3.8 56.9% 72.4% 49.7% 54.0% 39.6% 62.6% 35.8% 2005 1/1 3.0 4.0 63.1% 60.4% 48.4% 71.4% 40.0% 56.0% 39.0%
28 2001 19/22 3.9 3.2 57.9% 66.2% 46.8% 61.6% 40.2% 57.6% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 2/3 2.0 1.5 60.7% 64.1% 57.5% 40.0% 0.0% 61.5% 25.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1/1 5.0 0.0 60.8% 68.9% 37.9% 42.9% 75.0% 56.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 270/322 4.4 2.8 55.9% 70.4% 48.2% 55.6% 41.7% 60.5% 37.4% — 116/133 2.3 2.4 64.2% 63.4% 48.8% 48.3% 42.9% 58.2% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karim Alami Markus Hipfl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1491 99.9 +1.43 -2.60 0.570 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
17 1990 1488 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.05 1995 1485 101.0 +0.52 +1.20 0.633 40.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1493 109.0 -1.54 +0.61 0.895 47.2% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.24
19 1992 1459 103.2 -1.47 -0.13 0.807 46.6% — +29 — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.12 1997 1462 98.2 -0.14 -2.54 0.995 49.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 1993 1475 106.9 -3.07 -2.89 0.920 48.5% — +38 — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — +0.42 1998 1508 114.6 -0.71 +0.31 0.894 47.3% — +41 — 46.7% -0.40 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.23
21 1994 1506 125.9 -1.21 -0.48 0.959 49.2% +61 -2 +91 40.0% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 8–5 (62%) — +1.14 1999 1591 128.5 -0.84 +2.00 1.075 50.9% -78 +74 — 52.6% +0.26 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.06
22 1995 1617 122.6 -0.13 -0.28 0.984 49.7% -30 +10 — 50.7% +0.06 5–5 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.51 2000 1571 126.9 -1.56 +0.32 0.972 49.4% -93 +109 — 43.1% -0.69 3–4 (43%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.49
23 1996 1653 128.3 -0.43 -2.34 0.903 48.3% -161 +80 — 39.5% -0.74 6–2 (75%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.91 2001 1574 134.5 -2.21 +1.33 0.953 49.0% -129 +138 -96 48.6% -0.18 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.27
24 1997 1620 129.9 +0.05 +0.05 0.989 49.4% -162 +68 — 44.4% -0.40 8–7 (53%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.30 2002 1567 127.4 -2.40 +0.71 0.934 48.7% -69 +91 — 47.1% -0.21 0–7 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.81
25 1998 1655 137.2 -1.24 -0.31 0.931 48.5% -150 +116 — 46.4% -0.39 9–5 (64%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.32 2003 1509 95.1 -5.51 -3.56 0.693 43.6% — +73 — 33.3% -2.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.38
26 1999 1735 143.2 +0.18 +0.65 1.002 50.1% -212 +82 — 52.0% +0.21 10–8 (56%) 8–13 (38%) — -1.98 2004 1495 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1643 133.0 +0.50 -0.95 0.955 49.2% -36 +70 -118 46.4% -0.29 11–12 (48%) 12–10 (55%) — +0.55 2005 1477 99.0 +0.24 -0.09 0.886 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.22
28 2001 1527 113.0 -2.51 -1.95 0.829 46.3% -8 +94 — 24.1% -1.63 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1534 103.3 -2.21 -3.26 0.666 43.0% — — — 33.3% -1.33 — 1–0 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1521 102.9 -3.07 +0.46 0.800 45.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1800 135.3 -0.50 -0.67 0.946 48.9% -80 +67 -40 44.2% -0.40 53–47 (53%) 57–58 (50%) 104.7 +0.15 — 1687 129.6 -1.94 +0.67 0.942 48.7% -90 +96 -96 46.1% -0.38 13–27 (33%) 17–14 (55%) 95.8 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.