H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Karim Alami vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 1-1
Karim Alami and Nicklas Kulti are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karim Alami leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicklas Kulti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicklas Kulti won the 1997 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nicklas Kulti | 6-4 6-2 6-4 | Karim Alami | Match data |
| May 5, 1996* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Karim Alami | 6-3 6-4 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karim Alami | #1,418 | #25 | 1,196 | 1,798 | 140 | 177 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karim Alami | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1994 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #73 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1996 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #56 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1997 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #55 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #72 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1999 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #203 | 1,512 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #479 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |