H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Karim Alami vs Quino Munoz H2H: 1-0

Karim Alami holds a 1–0 lead over Quino Munoz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karim Alami leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Karim Alami won the 1997 Bologna round of 16 3-6 6-0 6-3.

MAR Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Karim Alami #60 3-6 6-0 6-3 Quino Munoz Match data Jun 13, 1997* R16 Bologna World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karim Alami #1,418 #25 1,196 1,799 143 179 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Quino Munoz 1,555 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karim Alami Quino Munoz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 0–1 0.0% #340 1,488 0 0
19 1992 0–3 0.0% #437 1,458 0 0
20 1993 2–2 50.0% #205 1,475 0 0
21 1994 12–19 38.7% #88 1,506 0 0
22 1995 15–14 51.7% #73 1,616 0 0
23 1996 16–21 43.2% #56 1,652 0 2
24 1997 23–27 46.0% #55 1,619 0 2
25 1998 19–21 47.5% #72 1,655 0 2
26 1999 26–22 54.2% #31 1,735 0 2
27 2000 24–29 45.3% #57 1,642 0 2
28 2001 5–17 22.7% #203 1,526 0 2
29 2002 1–2 33.3% #479 1,533 0 2
30 2003 0–1 0.0% #990 1,520 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karim Alami Quino Munoz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1992 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1993 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1994 4 4 8 50.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1995 4 4 8 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1996 1 6 7 14.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1998 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1997 0 4 4 0.0% 21 19 40 52.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1999 3 4 7 42.9% 22 15 37 59.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2000 13 15 28 46.4% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2001 0 6 6 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3%
29 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2003 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 28 50 78 35.9% 109 106 215 50.7% 5 10 15 33.3% 1 13 14 7.1% 3 4 7 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karim Alami Quino Munoz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1488 99.8 0.0% -2.00 +0.05
19 1992 1459 103.2 -1.47 -0.13 0.807 46.6% +29 33.3% -1.00 0–2 1–0 +0.12
20 1993 1475 106.9 -3.07 -2.89 0.920 48.5% +38 50.0% 0.00 1–1 +0.42
21 1994 1506 125.9 -1.21 -0.48 0.959 49.2% +61 -2 +91 40.0% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 8–5 (62%) 102.8 +1.14
22 1995 1617 122.6 -0.13 -0.28 0.984 49.7% -30 +10 50.7% +0.06 5–5 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 98.7 +1.51 1997 1500 97.7 +42 42.9% -1.71 0–1 1–0 -0.05
23 1996 1653 128.3 -0.43 -2.34 0.903 48.3% -161 +80 39.5% -0.74 6–2 (75%) 6–5 (55%) 105.5 -0.91 1998 1542 123.2 +33 55.6% +0.33 0–1 1–1 -0.33
24 1997 1620 129.9 +0.05 +0.05 0.989 49.4% -163 +68 44.4% -0.40 8–7 (53%) 4–6 (40%) 98.8 +0.30
25 1998 1655 137.2 -1.24 -0.31 0.931 48.5% -150 +116 46.4% -0.39 9–5 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 109.4 -0.32
26 1999 1735 143.2 +0.18 +0.65 1.002 50.1% -212 +82 52.0% +0.21 10–8 (56%) 8–13 (38%) 99.8 -1.98
27 2000 1643 133.0 +0.50 -0.95 0.955 49.2% -36 +70 -118 46.4% -0.29 11–12 (48%) 12–10 (55%) 100.7 +0.55 2002 1520 97.3
28 2001 1527 113.0 -2.51 -1.95 0.829 46.3% -8 +94 24.1% -1.63 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.45 2003 1507 97.6
29 2002 1534 103.3 -2.21 -3.26 0.666 43.0% 33.3% -1.33 1–0 -0.01
30 2003 1521 102.9 -3.07 +0.46 0.800 45.4% 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.07
Career 1800 135.3 -0.50 -0.67 0.946 48.9% -80 +67 -40 44.2% -0.40 53–47 (53%) 57–58 (50%) 104.7 +0.15 1556 107.7 +37 50.0% -0.56 0–2 2–1 (67%) -5.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.