H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Karl Meiler vs Hans Jurgen Pohmann H2H: 1-1
Karl Meiler and Hans Jurgen Pohmann are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karl Meiler leads 1–0 on clay, while Hans Jurgen Pohmann leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karl Meiler won the 1974 Rome third round 2-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 79
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1974* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Karl Meiler | 2-6 7-5 6-3 | Hans Jurgen Pohmann | Match data |
| Jun 10, 1973* | Berlin | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Hans Jurgen Pohmann | 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Karl Meiler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karl Meiler | #920 | #20 | 0 | 1,894 | 252 | 189 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Hans Jurgen Pohmann | #511 | #30 | 0 | 1,802 | 119 | 125 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karl Meiler | Hans Jurgen Pohmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1968 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1970 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1971 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1972 | 15–5 | 75.0% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1973 | 47–28 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1974 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #67 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1975 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #31 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1976 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #54 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #44 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1977 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #74 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1978 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1979 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #169 | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,603 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #284 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #511 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #270 | 1,554 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,588 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |