H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Karol Kucera vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 2-0
Karol Kucera holds a 2–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karol Kucera leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karol Kucera won the 2003 Chennai fourth round 7-6(6) 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2003* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Karol Kucera | 7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2002* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Karol Kucera | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karol Kucera | #1,540 | #6 | 2,732 | 1,994 | 259 | 230 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karol Kucera | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #352 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #63 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #8 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #17 | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #73 | 1,764 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #101 | 1,721 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #83 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,764 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #91 | 1,674 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #310 | 1,669 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |