H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Karol Kucera vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 3-5

Cedric Pioline holds a 5–3 lead over Karol Kucera in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Karol Kucera leads 2–1 on carpet, while Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Karol Kucera won the 2001 Paris Masters second round 6-4 6-7(7) 6-3.

SVK Age 52 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 31, 2001* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Karol Kucera #122 6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 Cedric Pioline #87 Match data
Nov 9, 2000* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Karol Kucera #74 6-4 7-6(5) Cedric Pioline #15 Match data
Apr 23, 2000* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Cedric Pioline #12 6-2 6-4 Karol Kucera #42 Match data
Jun 30, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Cedric Pioline #39 6-4 5-7 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 Karol Kucera #13 Match data
Jan 15, 1999* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Karol Kucera #8 6-4 6-0 Cedric Pioline #14 Match data
Feb 28, 1998* London ATP 250 QF Carpet Cedric Pioline #18 6-3 4-6 6-2 Karol Kucera #13 Match data
May 1, 1997* Prague ATP 250 R32 Clay Cedric Pioline #41 7-5 4-6 6-4 Karol Kucera #61 Match data
Feb 15, 1996* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Cedric Pioline #44 6-4 6-4 Karol Kucera #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Karol Kucera #1,540 #6 2,732 1,994 259 230 53.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karol Kucera Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1991 1–1 50.0% #352 1,509 0 0
18 1992 0–1 0.0% #210 1,506 0 0
19 1993 1–3 25.0% #159 1,492 0 0
20 1994 13–13 50.0% #54 1,615 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1995 21–27 43.8% #79 1,623 0 1 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1996 17–24 41.5% #63 1,656 0 1 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1997 33–27 55.0% #24 1,831 0 2 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1998 48–27 64.0% #8 1,844 0 4 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1999 38–20 65.5% #17 1,851 0 5 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 2000 22–21 51.2% #73 1,764 0 5 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 2001 11–13 45.8% #101 1,721 0 5 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2002 18–16 52.9% #83 1,755 0 5 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2003 24–18 57.1% #40 1,764 0 6 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2004 9–14 39.1% #91 1,674 0 6 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2005 3–5 37.5% #310 1,669 0 6 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5