H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Karol Kucera vs David Prinosil H2H: 0-2
David Prinosil holds a 2–0 lead over Karol Kucera in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Prinosil leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1997 Rotterdam third round 6-2 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1997* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | David Prinosil | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Karol Kucera | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1996* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | David Prinosil | 7-5 6-4 | Karol Kucera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karol Kucera | #1,540 | #6 | 2,732 | 1,994 | 259 | 230 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karol Kucera | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #352 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #63 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #8 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #17 | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #73 | 1,764 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #101 | 1,721 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #83 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,764 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #91 | 1,674 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #310 | 1,669 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |