H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Karol Kucera vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 0-1
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Karol Kucera in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2002 Sydney fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2002* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-1 6-2 | Karol Kucera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karol Kucera | #1,540 | #6 | 2,732 | 1,994 | 259 | 230 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Karol Kucera | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #352 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #63 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #8 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #17 | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #73 | 1,764 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #101 | 1,721 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #83 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,764 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #91 | 1,674 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #310 | 1,669 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |