H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Karol Kucera vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 0-1
Jacco Eltingh holds a 1–0 lead over Karol Kucera in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jacco Eltingh leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jacco Eltingh won the 1994 Moscow fourth round 6-4 3-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 1994* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jacco Eltingh | 6-4 3-6 7-6(2) | Karol Kucera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karol Kucera | #1,540 | #6 | 2,732 | 1,994 | 259 | 230 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Jacco Eltingh | #1,378 | #19 | 1,332 | 1,874 | 124 | 140 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karol Kucera | Jacco Eltingh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #352 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #128 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #78 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #63 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #63 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #23 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1998 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #8 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #43 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #17 | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #307 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2000 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #73 | 1,764 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #604 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #101 | 1,721 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #83 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,764 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #91 | 1,674 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #310 | 1,669 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |