Karol Kucera
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | 5 | 5 | 10 | Sep 21, 2000 | H2H |
| Fabrice Santoro | 7 | 2 | 9 | Jun 13, 2003 | H2H |
| Alex Corretja | 1 | 7 | 8 | Oct 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Cedric Pioline | 3 | 5 | 8 | Oct 31, 2001 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 25, 2004 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Karol Kucera holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karol Kucera leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karol Kucera won the 1997 Stuttgart Masters round of 64 4-6 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karol Kucera | 4-6 6-4 7-6(3) | Mark Woodforde | Match data | Oct 22, 1997* | R64 | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | Carpet |
| Karol Kucera | 6-3 6-4 | Mark Woodforde | Match data | Jan 3, 1997* | R16 | Adelaide International | World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karol Kucera | #1,540 | #6 | 2,732 | 1,995 | 261 | 233 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,921 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karol Kucera | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #352 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #63 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #24 | 1,832 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,718 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #17 | 1,852 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #101 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #83 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2003 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,763 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2004 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #91 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,803 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #310 | 1,665 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,583 | 0 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Karol Kucera | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1991 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 20 | 1994 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1986 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1987 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1996 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1988 | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1997 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 1989 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1998 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1990 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 25 | 1999 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 1991 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 26 | 2000 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1992 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2001 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1993 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% |
| 28 | 2002 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% |
| 29 | 2003 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1995 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 30 | 2004 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1996 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 31 | 2005 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 119 | 98 | 217 | 54.8% | 57 | 76 | 133 | 42.9% | 36 | 25 | 61 | 59.0% | 49 | 34 | 83 | 59.0% | — | 179 | 153 | 332 | 53.9% | 41 | 54 | 95 | 43.2% | 48 | 43 | 91 | 52.7% | 45 | 44 | 89 | 50.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 438/494 of Karol Kucera's and 380/434 of Mark Woodforde's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Karol Kucera | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 1991 | 1/2 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 36.5% | 69.6% | 65.0% | 85.7% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 45.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 43.3% | 73.1% | 41.2% | 42.9% | 33.3% | 55.0% | 36.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 4/4 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 46.2% | 72.2% | 48.1% | 52.7% | 42.3% | 59.9% | 33.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 24/26 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 53.8% | 67.6% | 46.5% | 50.8% | 47.3% | 57.9% | 41.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 41/48 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 52.7% | 68.2% | 46.6% | 57.7% | 40.4% | 58.2% | 40.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 35/43 | 4.0 | 5.2 | 55.6% | 68.2% | 47.1% | 55.0% | 42.6% | 58.7% | 39.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 53/60 | 3.8 | 5.3 | 55.2% | 69.6% | 47.6% | 49.2% | 46.5% | 60.0% | 40.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 63/75 | 5.8 | 5.0 | 56.4% | 72.6% | 49.9% | 61.2% | 49.8% | 62.8% | 43.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 53/58 | 5.1 | 3.9 | 57.9% | 72.9% | 51.3% | 53.7% | 49.6% | 63.8% | 43.3% | 1991 | 29/33 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 55.8% | 65.5% | 47.4% | 50.6% | 38.5% | 57.4% | 37.7% |
| 26 | 2000 | 38/45 | 6.4 | 5.4 | 52.1% | 73.9% | 48.1% | 58.4% | 42.2% | 61.5% | 41.1% | 1992 | 45/50 | 4.4 | 3.2 | 58.7% | 72.6% | 48.1% | 59.0% | 42.7% | 62.7% | 39.2% |
| 27 | 2001 | 23/24 | 4.9 | 5.0 | 55.4% | 70.4% | 45.3% | 42.0% | 42.3% | 59.0% | 40.2% | 1993 | 44/48 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 56.8% | 71.9% | 50.1% | 65.2% | 46.4% | 62.2% | 39.5% |
| 28 | 2002 | 31/34 | 5.1 | 5.5 | 58.8% | 68.5% | 45.8% | 47.5% | 52.6% | 58.2% | 39.6% | 1994 | 44/52 | 4.4 | 3.3 | 53.5% | 72.9% | 53.2% | 58.2% | 39.2% | 63.6% | 39.5% |
| 29 | 2003 | 40/42 | 5.4 | 4.4 | 57.3% | 71.1% | 48.7% | 55.8% | 46.1% | 61.7% | 40.0% | 1995 | 53/56 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 57.5% | 72.8% | 51.7% | 55.9% | 37.9% | 63.5% | 40.7% |
| 30 | 2004 | 23/24 | 5.8 | 4.4 | 61.2% | 70.9% | 49.4% | 52.3% | 49.4% | 62.6% | 38.4% | 1996 | 49/57 | 5.2 | 3.8 | 58.4% | 73.8% | 50.2% | 65.5% | 46.4% | 64.0% | 37.5% |
| 31 | 2005 | 8/8 | 6.0 | 4.8 | 56.5% | 62.9% | 51.9% | 60.7% | 57.6% | 57.9% | 34.1% | 1997 | 41/50 | 5.7 | 4.1 | 58.5% | 71.7% | 47.3% | 60.7% | 41.1% | 61.2% | 38.6% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 40/49 | 5.0 | 3.8 | 55.1% | 73.1% | 48.5% | 58.7% | 44.8% | 62.1% | 36.4% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 27/29 | 5.4 | 3.0 | 62.9% | 67.2% | 48.5% | 57.7% | 42.1% | 59.9% | 36.6% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8/10 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 57.8% | 64.1% | 49.6% | 52.0% | 35.6% | 58.2% | 37.6% |
| Career | — | 438/494 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 55.8% | 70.5% | 48.3% | 54.2% | 46.6% | 60.7% | 40.8% | — | 380/607 | 4.6 | 3.5 | 57.3% | 71.6% | 49.7% | 59.3% | 42.1% | 62.1% | 38.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Karol Kucera | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1991 | 1510 | 99.2 | -0.34 | -0.73 | 1.352 | 55.2% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.50 | — | — | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 1506 | 107.8 | +1.94 | +0.49 | 0.815 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 1493 | 107.7 | -0.38 | -0.91 | 0.835 | 47.3% | — | +43 | — | 30.0% | -1.30 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.01 | 1985 | 1579 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | -12 | — | +27 | 58.6% | +0.41 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.8 | +1.07 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1617 | 124.2 | -2.17 | +1.05 | 0.978 | 49.4% | -93 | +34 | — | 45.2% | -0.31 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–4 (33%) | 103.9 | +0.29 | 1986 | 1547 | 116.0 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -49 | +94 | 41.7% | -0.80 | 3–3 (50%) | 5–4 (56%) | 102.1 | +1.28 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1625 | 128.1 | -3.11 | +1.46 | 0.961 | 49.3% | -21 | -56 | +36 | 46.1% | -0.47 | 8–9 (47%) | 9–6 (60%) | 103.3 | +1.18 | 1987 | 1648 | 124.1 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -154 | -35 | 49.3% | +0.15 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–5 (44%) | 101.9 | +0.67 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1657 | 140.0 | -1.67 | +1.61 | 0.965 | 49.3% | -9 | -82 | +62 | 43.1% | -0.04 | 8–2 (80%) | 5–14 (26%) | 103.2 | -0.90 | 1988 | 1802 | 150.3 | — | — | — | — | +12 | -238 | -103 | 56.2% | +0.39 | 9–9 (50%) | 8–7 (53%) | 104.5 | -2.00 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1832 | 145.3 | -1.29 | +2.80 | 1.013 | 50.0% | -21 | -141 | -84 | 49.6% | +0.04 | 11–9 (55%) | 6–4 (60%) | 103.9 | -1.69 | 1989 | 1715 | 129.3 | — | — | — | — | +66 | -145 | -42 | 53.1% | +0.08 | 7–6 (54%) | 7–8 (47%) | 99.1 | +1.09 |
| 24 | 1998 | 1846 | 161.4 | +0.91 | +5.75 | 1.163 | 53.0% | +34 | -55 | -157 | 59.8% | +0.70 | 16–13 (55%) | 15–13 (54%) | 98.2 | -2.10 | 1990 | 1718 | 128.5 | — | — | — | — | +12 | — | +3 | 50.0% | -0.05 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–5 (17%) | 97.3 | -0.18 |
| 25 | 1999 | 1853 | 152.3 | +1.99 | +5.08 | 1.196 | 53.0% | +24 | -89 | -80 | 64.6% | +1.00 | 7–9 (44%) | 13–8 (62%) | 98.2 | -0.21 | 1991 | 1633 | 130.1 | -2.30 | -0.49 | 0.885 | 47.4% | +67 | -69 | — | 36.9% | -0.96 | 5–3 (63%) | 6–5 (55%) | 101.8 | -1.26 |
| 26 | 2000 | 1767 | 147.6 | -0.07 | +3.71 | 1.065 | 51.2% | -8 | +56 | +26 | 51.3% | +0.32 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–9 (36%) | 96.9 | -2.34 | 1992 | 1813 | 146.1 | +1.29 | +1.66 | 1.050 | 50.8% | +8 | -233 | -144 | 53.6% | +0.17 | 6–10 (38%) | 14–9 (61%) | 101.0 | -3.48 |
| 27 | 2001 | 1723 | 133.9 | -1.96 | +1.87 | 0.979 | 49.4% | +28 | +25 | — | 45.3% | -0.11 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–7 (36%) | 97.0 | -1.09 | 1993 | 1793 | 147.8 | +1.20 | +1.32 | 1.046 | 50.8% | +19 | -190 | -121 | 56.7% | +0.46 | 9–7 (56%) | 8–7 (53%) | 100.4 | -0.21 |
| 28 | 2002 | 1756 | 129.2 | -2.48 | +2.17 | 0.948 | 48.8% | +31 | -87 | -5 | 48.3% | -0.36 | 10–3 (77%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.7 | -1.25 | 1994 | 1793 | 144.0 | +2.05 | +1.57 | 1.087 | 51.3% | +8 | -106 | -143 | 54.0% | +0.28 | 7–4 (64%) | 9–9 (50%) | 101.3 | -1.31 |
| 29 | 2003 | 1763 | 141.0 | -0.44 | +2.57 | 1.044 | 50.7% | +37 | -184 | +57 | 57.8% | +0.34 | 5–5 (50%) | 15–10 (60%) | 101.8 | -0.62 | 1995 | 1761 | 143.4 | +1.40 | +2.84 | 1.115 | 51.5% | -7 | -71 | -60 | 57.0% | +0.31 | 6–9 (40%) | 12–10 (55%) | 96.4 | -2.71 |
| 30 | 2004 | 1668 | 134.1 | -0.65 | +2.30 | 1.027 | 50.5% | +66 | -105 | +102 | 43.1% | -0.25 | 4–3 (57%) | 6–8 (43%) | 98.9 | -1.86 | 1996 | 1803 | 152.4 | +2.11 | +1.19 | 1.039 | 51.0% | +37 | -161 | -119 | 53.2% | +0.43 | 11–9 (55%) | 11–14 (44%) | 99.0 | -3.08 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1665 | 103.1 | -1.58 | -1.94 | 0.810 | 46.0% | +47 | — | +72 | 42.1% | -0.84 | — | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.40 | 1997 | 1736 | 142.0 | -0.58 | +1.92 | 0.993 | 49.9% | +5 | -6 | +26 | 51.5% | +0.08 | 6–10 (38%) | 11–9 (55%) | 98.9 | -0.85 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1748 | 139.4 | +0.21 | -0.55 | 0.962 | 49.2% | -9 | -86 | +48 | 52.0% | +0.15 | 8–10 (44%) | 7–10 (41%) | 93.9 | -0.36 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1610 | 125.8 | -1.05 | -0.14 | 0.914 | 48.2% | +18 | +2 | +120 | 39.5% | -0.32 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–11 (27%) | 93.5 | -0.93 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1584 | 116.0 | -0.30 | +0.27 | 0.898 | 47.9% | +5 | — | — | 45.8% | -0.29 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.24 |
| Career | — | 1996 | 149.0 | -0.72 | +2.99 | 1.038 | 50.6% | +12 | -50 | -5 | 51.8% | +0.15 | 82–65 (56%) | 89–90 (50%) | 102.0 | -2.25 | — | 1921 | 146.3 | +0.70 | +1.19 | 1.018 | 50.2% | +18 | -119 | -13 | 51.6% | +0.11 | 93–99 (48%) | 111–116 (49%) | 97.4 | -2.06 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | 5 | 5 | 10 | Sep 21, 2000 | H2H |
| Fabrice Santoro | 7 | 2 | 9 | Jun 13, 2003 | H2H |
| Alex Corretja | 1 | 7 | 8 | Oct 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Cedric Pioline | 3 | 5 | 8 | Oct 31, 2001 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 25, 2004 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 1 | 10 | 11 | Jun 12, 1998 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 4 | 6 | 10 | Mar 6, 1999 | H2H |
| Jim Courier | 5 | 5 | 10 | Jan 8, 1998 | H2H |
| Richard Fromberg | 7 | 2 | 9 | Jan 2, 1997 | H2H |
| Thomas Enqvist | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jul 29, 1999 | H2H |